Implementing and Operating Cisco Collaboration Core Technologies (CLCOR) — Question 409
When a call is delivered to a gateway, the calling and called party number must be adapted to the PSTN service requirements of the trunk group. If a call is destined locally, the + sign and the explicit country code must be replaced with a national prefix. For the same city or region, the local area code must be replaced by a local prefix as applicable. Assuming that a Cisco UCM has a SIP trunk to a New York gateway (area code 917), which two combinations of solutions localize the calling and called party for a New York phone user? (Choose two.)
Answer options
- A. Configure the gateway to translate the calling number and apply it to the dial peer. Combine it with a translation profile for called numbers. ! voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^1917/ // rule 2 /^ [+]1917/ // ! voice translation-profile strip+1 translate calling 1 !
- B. Configure two calling party transformation patterns: \+1917.CCCCCC, strip pre-dot, numbering type: subscriber \+!, strip pre-dot, numbering type: national
- C. Configure two called party transformation patterns: \+1917.XXXXXXX, strip pre-dot, numbering type: subscriber \+1.!, strip pre-dot, numbering type: national
- D. Configure the gateway to translate called numbers and apply it to the dial peer. Combine it with a translation profile for calling numbers. ! voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^1917/ // rule 2 /^[+]1917/ // ! voice translation-profile strip+1 translate called 1 !
- E. Configure two calling party transformation patterns: \+1917.XXXXXXX, strip pre-dot, numbering type: subscriber \+1.!, strip pre-dot, numbering type: national
Correct answer: C, E
Explanation
The correct answers, C and E, effectively transform the called and calling party numbers by using the appropriate patterns to strip the international format and adapt them to the national format. Options A and D focus on translating calling numbers but do not provide the necessary transformations for both calling and called parties. Option B does not address the required transformation for the called party numbers.