Avaya OneCloud UCaaS Fundamentals — Question 15
A customer explains that calls are failing to route from Avaya Aura® Session Manager (SM) A (managed by Avaya Aura® System Manager (SMGR) A) to an
Avaya Aura® Session Manager (SM) B (managed by Avaya Aura® System Manager (SMGR) B)
When you check the configuration in Avaya Aura® Session Manager (SM) A, witch statement describes what should you look for?
Answer options
- A. SM B is defined as a SIP Entity of type "other" +Entity Link, Dial Pattern and Routing Policy.
- B. SM B is defined as a SIP Entity of type "Session Manager" +Entity Link, Dial Pattern and Routing Policy.
- C. SM B is defined as a SIP Entity of type "Session Manager" +Entity Link.
- D. SM B is defined as a SIP Entity of type "other" +Entity Link.
Correct answer: B
Explanation
The correct answer is B because a Session Manager must be defined as a SIP Entity of type 'Session Manager' to allow proper routing and management of calls between the two Session Managers. The other options are incorrect as they define SM B as an 'other' type or omit necessary configurations like Dial Pattern and Routing Policy, which are essential for call routing functionality.